Reagan: Collective Bargaining Fall-Guy

       Reagan: Collective Bargaining Fall-Guy

Collective bargaining groups claiming for years. Creating a better future through regulatory legislation controls on business relationship with employees.
We're at the future of not better then what was. At this point and time a continuation of same failed methods of resolve begs the question. The value of similar minded devised tactics to produce the products claimed by organisers of labor. The end results of past efforts seem to have failed to deliver what they've claimed to manufacture.
Largely because common ideas of the populace, don't align with realistic cycles and trends of economics.

Undeniable facts of failed attempts to produce sustainable  lifestyle improvements by legislative processes exists in our current situation.
The baby boomers children and their peers are well aware of the bleak economic future.

There is no denying the state of crisis in the U.S. and world economic situation.
The realistic decline of employment opportunities which effects living standards within the States. The claims of creating a better living standards for future generations. Never materialized.
If I had merely indulged in government entitlement programs then I likely wouldn't have any experience. Rightfully this is why many people speak from no experience. They've been taught to depend on agents negotiations. Having never successful developed their own excellent employment packages. They don't believe an individual can generate great wages on their own.

I candidly exposed as poor examples of arrogant induced ignorant methodologies.
The major theme in U.S. labor related political legislation has been the ideas of improving the plight of the common citizens.
Which hasn't materialized into factual evidence. 

I'm not against the "concept" of Collective Bargaining. Mostly much of their ideas were developed within a nearsighted, short term, glamour blinded, Wild eyed, mindset. Expected to rocket flight individuals into the blurry higher economic level orbits. Basically ill formulated, poorly implemented, unsustainable tactics. Lacking substantial knowledge about the facts related to labor and the  global markets of the elitists world. Such elements having been in existence long before the trade routes into the Orient.
I disagree with the emotional charged idea that Unions built the middle class. The industrial revolution and assembly lines influence on reduction to living costs had more to do with middle class expansion. Also the modernized manufacturing or industrial era, is what gave the foothold or fertile soils for the Unions to establish roots. To which previously, manufacturing was largely produced within the cottage industries of loosely unified independent fabricators.

The true facts of Unions strength is even though a very small percentage of citizens are organized. They're well established within the halls of  government, bureaucracies, public service sectors. They control all the power structures and are endowed with horrendous authority to maintain the desired momentum of that ideology.

The extremely wealth control and manipulate either side of the left and right participants within the political environment of U.S. An alternative version is like any corporation having potential of failing to provide a valuable product. The organised labor were causal minded about the continuous effort needed to keep their items on the shelves of the public desire. They sold ideas they haven't been fortunate enough to deliver. Then claimed the competition dealing down and dirty. Wealthy people i believe learn differently growing up about the harshness of existence. Not to say they aren't picked up by family after a business failure. Although they're expectations of self reliance exceeds the levels taught within the labor class family environment. Ergo the expression "Necessity is the Mother of Invention"
My ideas are that economics have never, at higher levels particularly been coupled with human need. This myth has been propagated by political empowerment schemes.
However in theory the ideas of organized labor being essential to staving off tyranny I would be in agreement to.
The episode between Reagan and the Air Traffic Controllers is a "face saving" expression of why organized labor lost some market shares or say favor in the eyes of the greater populace.